![]() The overall movement is chronological: chapter 1 provides potted introductions to the main Cynics and others more or less influenced by Cynicism, while chapters 2-6 treat major themes and concerns, with recurrent movements from negative to positive. The basic organization is coherent (if problematic in some respects). The glossaries, bibliography, index and the wide-ranging and detailed ‘guide to further reading’ are excellent, the last of value to specialists as well as beginners. Hence a need for a deft mixture of primary material and context or background, of basic information and critical analysis.ĭesmond, well-informed author of the well-received The Greek Praise of Poverty: Origins of Ancient Cynicism (2006) ( ), writes, indeed, freshly and engagingly, and his wide stylistic range includes colloquialisms, jokes and nice turns. ![]() clear and rigorous presentations of core ideas … for students of philosophy and classics’, to almost all of whom almost of all of this material will be new. ![]() Add the prospectus of this series, Ancient Philosophies: ‘fresh and engaging introductions to the major schools of philosophy of antiquity. It also requires considerable discrimination in the use of the ancient evidence, extremely lacunose and varied as it is. It requires competence over a vast time span, over many different periods and cultures, over not only philosophy but also history, politics, literature, religion (Jewish and Christian as well as pagan), and art, and it includes major Classical writers (Horace, Petronius, Lucian) and major European philosophers (Rousseau, Nietzsche). To write a compendium to the Cynics covering their history from the 4 th century BCE to the 6 th century CE and their huge and diverse influence from their beginnings down the ages to the present day is an unspeakable task.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |